Saturday, July 19, 2025

The Poor Among Us


"And when you reap the harvest of your land, you shall not reap your field right up to its edge, nor shall you gather the gleanings after your harvest. You shall leave them for the poor and for the sojourner: I am the Lord your God."
Leviticus 23:22 ESV

 

Recently, in the United States, there has been discussion about helping people experiencing poverty in this nation. A piece of legislation in Congress sparked a conversation known as "The Big Beautiful Bill." A part of this bill was a work requirement for the able-bodied to receive Medicaid, our safety net for the poor in our nation. 

 

The Bible does encourage people to be concerned about the poor among us, but it does not promote a lack of responsibility for the able-bodied among us. Along with the many references to God's concern for the poor of this world is 2 Thessalonians 3:10, "For even when we were with you, we would give you this command: If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat." When we read the Bible, we need to read it in its entirety, not just the parts that appeal to us.

 

In the reference in Leviticus, God provided for the poor in Israel. Israel was not to harvest to the very edge of their fields. They were to leave some for people in need among them. Yet, the poor and the sojourner had to take the initiative and go out and gather it. Food was not just given to them without any effort on their part. In our country, in a desire to be compassionate, we have denied people the right to experience the value of work. When we make people who can work dependent on us, we do them no favor. 

 

The talking point that people use regarding a work requirement for Medicaid is that statistics show many individuals lose their benefits. Could that be because many of them get jobs where they don't need the benefits? If they lose their Medicaid because they refuse to work, should they still eat?

 

Monday, July 3, 2023

The Golden Age of the Automobile



My brother, Allen, would round the corner a half block from our house in his 1968 Pontiac GTO. His dual muffler pack would announce its arrival before him getting there. We called it the Golden GTO (Goat).

We grew up in Brownsville, PA., in the 50s and 60s. It was often said in earlier days that Pittsburgh would never amount to anything because it was too close to Brownsville. We never knew if that was true or just an old wise tale.

General Motors came out with the GTO and Ford Mustang in 1964 Camaro in 1966. The age of speed and power in the automobile industry was upon us. I don't remember my brother's GTO horsepower, but it would make the teeth of green new dealers’ chatter if I told you. It was a simpler time back then. You did not have to worry about noise pollution; the louder, the better, and more heads it turned. We did not have to worry about catalytic converters and your carbon footprint to curb air pollution because the EPA didn't exist. You didn't have to think about gas prices, as the average gallon cost was 34 cents. We did not have to be concerned about supply-chain problems as everything, from the tires up, was made in the USA.

My brother would drive down the street and rattle through his four-speed transmission on the floor, and his muffler would crescendo like a perfectly tuned orchestra. It was as if he made a fashion statement every time he accelerated. It was as if the power cars of the day had their own mystique and personality and most were faithful to a brand, be it General Motors, Ford, or Chrysler.

After my brother got his GTO, I inherited his 1955 Chevy, which was an automotive cultural icon on its own.  My brother drove it for a long time with just a primer gray paint finish, a trend in that day.  People referred to it as the “Gray Ghost.”  He converted it from a three-speed shifter on the column to Hurst three-speed floor shifter.  Floor shifting was considered the new or novel way to go.

It was the hot car of the late 50s and early 60s, but not so literally hot. The heater would take a long time to heat up. I commuted to college at California State College, PennWest California today, located in California, PA, a trip of about five or six miles.  Mornings in the winter trimester could be at or below 0 degrees Fahrenheit.  On these cold mornings I would crank up my Chevy and head out to school.  About the time that I pulled into the college parking lot the heater was just starting to blow hot air. That afternoon as the shadows were increasing and the temperature dropping on those short winter days, I drove home. About the time I pulled into the curb at 521 Green Street, you guessed it, I just started to feel the warm air from the heater. Needless to say, I never took my off my winter gloves or earmuffs on these trips.

This car did not have power steering or power brakes; the only thing power about them was the strength of your arms or legs. If you were not claustrophobic, you would be after you rode in the back seat, but what it lacked in creature comforts, it made up with moxy. Most kids wanted to drive a 55 Chevy. We did not know anything about the luxury features of a car, so, what we did not know, did not hurt us. We just knew we had a car with a big engine and loud muffler that turned heads and got you from one place to another, and that was enough. Just how it was in those days.

The OPEC oil embargo in 1973 changed all this. Gas prices spiked, cars and engines got smaller, and the power car was gone. New cars that were better designed and more efficient started to be manufactured, but maybe I am getting old; but the new automobiles lack the mystique of the cars' 50s and 60s. These classic vehicles will never return, yet it is still fun for us war babies and baby boomers to remember the golden age of the automobile.  

I can still hear to this day the roll of thunder of the Golden GTO as it rumbled down the street.

Monday, January 18, 2021

Losing Our Freedom of Speech

 
In 1737 Benjamin Franklin wrote, "Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins."

Are we on the brink of tyranny?

Ben Franklin
We saw a terrible thing happen in the assault on Congress in Washington, DC, yet the adverse reaction can be worse than the crime. History teaches us that when something troubling happens in a society, we make two wrong moves. We overreact or under-react. No one denies that the people who committed these crimes need to be held accountable, yet people made some troubling reactions and suggestions in its aftermath. 

 

Big tech, who controls the flow of information in our country, is de-platforming people with whom they disagree politically. Voices from Germany and Mexico have warned us of the danger of these actions. Members of Congress are proposing a commission to discuss reigning in the freedom of the press. Be careful about what you seek. When the other party or political persuasion is in power, and the shoe is on the other foot, people may silence you.

 

Franklin finishes his statement with these words, "An evil magistrate intrusted with power to punish for words, would be armed with a weapon the most destructive and terrible. Under pretence of pruning off the exuberant branches, he would be apt to destroy the tree."

 

Are we undermining free speech and destroying democracy?

 

Friday, November 13, 2020

The Destruction of the Constitution

The Firewall of our Republic
In February of 2020 the Virginia House of Delegates passed Bill 177 moving Virginia away from the Electoral College system.  Del Mark Levine said, “Every Virginian’s vote should count. Anyone who opposes this bill opposes democracy.”  The problem with this quote is it flies in the face of the intent of the Framers of our Constitution.

 

They did not form a purely democratic form of government, but a Republic, or a Democratic Republic, as some call it.  The Framers, in their great foresight, saw a day when the more populous states could dominate the political landscape with very little voice given to the smaller states.  The Electoral College is the firewall that the Framers put into our Constitution to ensure that no group of densely populated states or cities could choose our President at the exclusion of the smaller states.

 

It appears that the Democrat Party has concluded that they can never control our national elections with the Electoral College in place.  Bill 177 in the Virginia House of Delegates starts the dismantling of our US Constitution. Either Delegate Levine and our Democrat lawmakers don’t understand the type of government our Founding Fathers constructed, or they do understand it, and they are intent on changing it to gain political power.  Either way, all Virginians, whether Republicans or Democrats, should be appalled at the destruction of our Constitution.

 

It has become very evident in the Election of 2020 the power that the Constitution has given to our states in electing a President. The battle ground for the defense of the Electoral College is in the state legislative bodies.  We must work here in Virginia and elsewhere to elect legislators who will defend our Constitution.

Monday, November 2, 2020

A Political Chameleon


 

Joe Biden: A Political Chameleon

 

Chameleons are lizard-like animals that can change their color according to the environment in which they are living.  Joe Biden is a political chameleon in that he can change his rhetoric according to the political environment in which he finds himself.

 


Joe Biden is a typical politician.  In the primary election cycle, he appealed to his far-left base.  When asked if he would end fracking, he said, “bingo.”  Recently, in the general election, he said that he would not ban fracking.  Will the real Joe Biden please stand up.  Historically, after Presidents have been elected, and particularly after their reelection, they start to show their real colors.  It will be the same with Biden because he is a political animal.

 

In 2016 the American electorate grew weary of politicians and elected Donald Trump.  Since Donald Trump came down that escalator in 2015, he has been the same.  You may not agree with everything he says or how he says it, but you know he believes what he says.  The American people are starved for authenticity in their governmental leaders.  They will put up with a few chinks in a person’s armor if they believe that he really means what he tells them.

                                         

The difference between the two Presidential candidates is clear.  Joe Biden is a political chameleon and will change with the political landscape. With Donald Trump, what you see is what you get.

 

Tuesday, October 6, 2020

Chris Wallace: Fair and Balanced?

 

This week On Fox News Sunday, a guest challenged Wallace about his bias. He referred to the guest’s comment as a talking point.  Is it a talking point, or is there bias?  Wallace can be tough on all his show's quests, but if you analyze how often he challenges liberal and conservative viewpoints, his bias becomes pretty obvious.

Let me make my case.  In the first debate, he challenged both Trump and Biden, yet he brought up far more discussions that were weak points for Trump than Biden.  I suggest that the challenging questions asked were at best 60/40 or probably 70/30 in favor of Biden.  Do the math.  In his show this week on Fox, Wallace interviewed pro-Trump and pro-Biden people.  He did ask the tough questions of both, but again, if you count the number of negative questions about Trump's actions and policies as opposed to Biden's, the breakdown was about 75/25 in favor of Biden.

I am not saying that Wallace is dishonest or is trying to be unfair.  He is just who he is, one with a liberal bent, and that is OK, but don't masquerade him as fair and balanced.  The apple never falls too far from the tree, and Wallace's tree is full of liberal fruit.  Some say that wisdom is just a keen sense of the obvious, and it is pretty obvious that Chris Wallace is not fair and balanced.

Tuesday, September 22, 2020

A Steeler Hero


What Al Villanueva, offensive tackle for the Pittsburgh Steelers, did Monday night, September 14th, 2020, was heroic. The Steelers decided to put the name of Antwon Rose,



a young African American man killed by a Pittsburgh police officer, on their helmets
Al Villanueva
for the 2020-2021 season. That night Villanueva replaced Rose's name with a young black war
hero
killed in Iraq.

The Steelers' management decision, though done for a good motive, I believe, was very misguided. Amid the furor around the tragic George Floyd death, the Steelers made a statement about the Rose fatality, while ignoring the circumstances around his death. Displaying his name on their helmets sends the message that he was the hero, and the police were the villains. Anytime we distort the truth, it only leads to more division and potential violence against those who protect us.

It is always tragic when you lose a son, no matter what the circumstances. We should not seek to denigrate one who has passed, but neither should we try to make him a hero when he was not. The facts in the case don't support the narrative that the police officer was wrong, and Rose was right. The officer was found not guilty by a group of his peers.  Are there things that the police can learn from this case, of course, but hindsight is always 20/20. I would not want to have been that officer in this situation.

Villanueva's sin, for which he has been vilified, is that he honored a young black man who really was a hero. Villanueva defied the principle of "group think." Team unity is good, but there is a higher principle: whether something is actually right or wrong. Inadvertently, though the Steelers say that they support diverse thought, they have put their players in an awkward situation to express it. It is becoming impermissible in our society to express independent thinking, which always leads to oppression rather than freedom.

Big Al, you are my hero, and I think many other fair-minded people in the Steeler Nation agree. 

 

Tuesday, April 21, 2020

Gravity Wins


I am seventy-four years old, and a few years back, I had an epiphany of sorts.  I realized that gravity wins. 

In recent decades, I have tried to live a healthy lifestyle.  I used to jog, and now I walk.  I ride my bike in the warmer seasons of the year.  I have tried to eat a healthy diet, with a few exceptions.
I have never met a donut I didn’t like. Diet and exercise can slow the process, but eventually, we all go the way of all flesh. Aging can be compared to furniture; when your chest starts to drop into your drawers.

You have probably heard about the octogenarian who once said, “there are three things that happen to you when you get old.  You lose your eyesight and hearing; I can’t remember what the third one is.”  A realistic and healthy perspective on life and death can be therapeutic.

COVID-19 and the fear of death have manipulated our society.  No one wants to die.  Anybody who says they have no fear is either a fool or a liar. Reasonable steps to avoid danger are proper.  Nonetheless, a morbid fear of the reality of our ultimate demise can rob us of life even before death.

Gravity does win.  In the recent movie about Mr. Rogers, when speaking about death, he said, “anything we can talk about we can manage.”  If we never come to grips with our mortality, we will neither live well nor die well.








Friday, October 11, 2019

Democracy or Tyranny?


Tyranny not Democracy
The definition of an impeachable offense was determined a long time ago. We need to listen to what the framers of our Constitution concluded.

As the framers were setting up the guidelines for the impeachment of a President, some suggested that a reason for removing a president could be mal-administration. In other words, you don’t like how the President governs. Alexander Hamilton objected, he stated they were not setting up a Parliamentary form of government like Britain, where you take a vote of confidence and remove a leader. It was to be for high crimes and misdemeanors. That is a high bar, but they intended it to be because of the gravity of the action. I suggest to you that what we are arguing about today is how this President governs. If the Democrats think we have mal-administration today, there is a solution; it’s called an election, not impeachment.

Our founding fathers wanted impeachment to be the last recourse, not the first. The Democrats have been talking about impeachment since the Presidential Inauguration in 2017. Is the reason we have had one investigation after another of our President because the Democrats don’t believe they can beat Trump at the ballot box in 2020? Democrat Representative Al Green of Texas said it out loud, “I concerned that if we don’t impeach this President, he will get re-elected.”

The will of the people is being usurped.  What we see playing out before our very eyes is not democracy, but tyranny.

Image used with permission by Microsoft.

Thursday, October 10, 2019

Political Nearsightedness


Myopia or “nearsightedness” or “shortsightedness” is an eye condition where you can view objects up close clearly, but things far away may appear blurry. I want to suggest to you that because of our political bias, we are so focused on to impeach or not to impeach, that we are oblivious to the long-range consequences to our democratic form of government. We have become politically “shortsighted.”

The transcript of President Trump’s call to the Ukrainian leader, the center of the impeachment controversy, has become a Rorschach test. The inkblot test where people see different things of the same image. Democrats read it and see an impeachable offense; Republicans do not. Beauty, or guilt, in this case, seems to be in the eye of the beholder.

So, the battle continues in a partisan manner, but the Democrats rule the House of Representatives and therefore have the bully pulpit. Something as grave as the removal of a duly elected President should be done only on a bipartisan basis. Take the vote and let both sides be represented and let the chips fall as they may. If they do not want to take the vote, then they should settle it the old fashion way, at the ballot box.

Maybe our political leaders need corrective lenses to view the situation as an American first, then as a Republican or Democrat. If we don’t, I fear that no one will ever be able to exercise the Office of the Presidency again.



Saturday, June 29, 2019

Flip-flops and Cargo Pants


A media pundit recently said the people at Donald Trump’s Florida rally to kick off his 2020 electoral campaign, were all wearing flip-flops and cargo pants.  It was reminiscent of Hilary Clinton’s famous “deplorables” comment in the last presidential election.  It appears the left-leaning press has not learned anything from the 2016 election cycle.

The news narrative has primarily been driven by the east and west coast media elites; Academia that thinks and act like they have a corner on moral authority.  They tend to look down over their noses at anyone who voted for, or in any way supports our President.  Liberals in our country have historically been the champions of the common man.  It appears that we have had a role reversal in this nation.  Trump’s following is mainly from middle-class America.  Not many are from elite universities, or some not college educated at all, but possess the dignity of creating with their hands.  It is people who work hard, pays their bills, and raise their families.  They are looking for common sense solutions to problems, rather than pie-in-the-sky policies from far-left ideologues.  They are the forgotten people of middle America that Trump has found, and arenas are not large enough to hold them.

Maybe liberal politicians and the mainstream media types ought to walk in the flip-flops of the common man who they seem to take delight in disparaging.  Only then will they understand what makes them tick and how Trump wins elections.

Image used with permission by Microsoft.

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

Joe Biden and Political Cannibalism


Filial cannibalism occurs when animals start to consume their species.  There is a type of political cannibalism going on in the Democrat party.  The progressive wing of this party is starting to destroy the stalwarts of their political persuasion like Joe Biden.

The Democrats have allowed the politically correct culture to dominate their party to the extent it is starting to devour its own people.  Successive generations of political correctness have evolved that are more judgmental and unforgiving.  Moral superiority has blossomed in the progressive camp to the extent that we get up in the morning asking ourselves not if, but what we will have to apologize for today.  We have transitioned from sexual assault and harassment, real crimes, to invading someone’s space, an offense disqualifying us for political service.  Soon politicians will be taken to task for reckless-eyeballing.

Politically speaking, I am not a fan of Joe Biden, but personally, he seems like a nice man.  I am tempted to feel a little sorry for him until I remember that he and others in his party have created this political monster that is now eating his lunch.  Political correctness can never be satisfied.  The more they have, the more they have to have. The newer in the species must consume the older to advance the agenda.

Mr. Biden, to survive, speak up. To the lie of the moral superiority of progressivism, just “say it ain’t so Joe, say it ain’t so.”

Thursday, January 31, 2019

Toxic Masculinity

Toxic Masculinity 

There is a narrative that prevails in this nation that is ready to light cultural wild-fires wherever it prevails. That storyline is toxic masculinity. 

Recently, the story about Catholic school teenagers dominated the news cycle for several days.  Reports surfaced that portrayed a group of Catholic students as having taunted a Native American man.  Upon further review of the complete video of the incident, it because apparently it that was not clear who was the aggressor, the boys or the Native American man. Many in the media rushed to judgment and presented a distorted view of reality, and just got it flat-out wrong. How could this happen?

Many have said that the media did not verify the source, but the bigger question is why?  A significant part of the press delights in reporting stories that support a narrative with which they agree.  Many who bring us the news have bought into the belief that men, and white men mainly, are the problem.  Of course, some white men are sexist and racist, but we are close to condemning a whole racial gender because of the sins of some.

These Catholic teenagers, on the surface, seemed to fit a profile that some in the media loathe.  They could not wait to get this story out there, even long enough to find out if it was true. Commentary parades as news reporting continually. Spreading the narrative of toxic masculinity will only divide us more than ever racially and by gender.

Image used with permission by Microsoft.  



Thursday, November 30, 2017

Americans First

Politicians have always sparred with their opponents, yet in the Trump era, have we reached a tipping point?   Due to the politics of character assassination, we are losing the ability to discuss issues and policies. Should we not be Americans first, then Republicans or Democrats, liberals or conservatives?

President Ronald Reagan and Speaker of the House, Tip O’Neill came from a different era in politics.  Reagan, a staunch conservative Republican, O’Neill, a life-long liberal Democrat, could not have been more different in their political views.  Reagan often started policy discussions with O’Neill by calling him his friend.  When Reagan won his landslide victory in 1984, O’Neill said that “in my 50 years of public life I’ve never seen a man more popular than you are with the American people.” Most opposition politicians today would rather have their tongues cut out than give President Trump even a veiled compliment. 


To be honest we have to admit that this type of political atmosphere did not start with President Trump.  We saw character assassination happen with President Obama, yet, I think it is honest to say that it has grown to heights never before seen under the Trump administration.  When we start to pick and choose which President, duly elected by the people, we honor and respect, it is a slap in the face of our democratic ideals. Unless we are Americans first, we may no longer be one nation, indivisible with justice for all.

Image used with permission by Microsoft.

Ken Barnes the author of “The Chicken Farm and Other Sacred Places”  YWAM Publishing
Email: 
kenbarnes737@gmail.com
website:
https://sites.google.com/site/kenbarnesbooksite/